121
I think . . . I think the length of HyFlex . . . and I mean, I see the point you only meet
once a week. So that’s good. Oh, and this in my classes is one time a week, 2 hour is a
long time to be in front of a computer. You get brain . . . your brain gets more tired when
. . . it’s in a computer that when it’s face-to-face. I don’t know why it is really, but it is
much more tiring in my opinion. I also get a lot more out of small group discussions. You
know? Where two or three students talking in a very direct task. Sometimes when they
throw up questions that are very vague, we find ourselves like . . . oh . . . what is it that
we have to discuss here? Like, do you understand? You know, like, he [the instructor]
wasn’t very specific. But when the questions are very well-formed and very specific and
you are in a small group, I actually learn a lot. Especially because the power thing we
were talking about is gone.
These participants pointed out the importance of designing HyFlex courses with built-in
opportunities for interaction and collaboration among the learners in a manner that brings
students together regardless of chosen participation mode. Although this is a fundamental aspect
of current HyFlex design guidance, it is not always done enough or consistently well. This need
to design and deliver HyFlex course content that has, among other features, built-in engagement
and socialization among students by design, not by accident, points to the importance of training
faculty how to design and implement HyFlex effectively.